Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NATIONAL CHILDREN'S FILM FESTIVAL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 09:48, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

NATIONAL CHILDREN'S FILM FESTIVAL

NATIONAL CHILDREN'S FILM FESTIVAL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The title is all capital and there are no references. Or else we could copy the article and change the title. TheMagikCow (talk) 13:13, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

• Keep In the 120 seconds between edits, what searches did you do to establish notability? I found this article on the Times of India website in 10 seconds, which should in itself be enough to meet WP:GNG. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 13:18, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 21:14, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 21:14, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:59, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

• Keep as a notable topic. Searching for this term in Google showed immediate results as seen here. TheMagikCow, as it has been done, a page can be moved so it is titlecase and not uppercase. In addition, per WP:BEFORE, you need to follow checks before resorting to WP:AFD. It was very easy to confirm that the topic is notable; please do this in the future. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 23:28, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep as easily notable topic. And @TheMagikCow: please study WP:NRVE. Specially when so easily found, sources do not have to be IN an article for the topic to be notable. THAT's a matter for regular editing, not deletion. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 23:51, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per above. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 03:12, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
• Speedy keep definitely notable organization. --AmritasyaPutra^T 16:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep - No valid reason for deletion provided in the nomination, which even says it could be copied to a new article with different title (which is reason for move, which is not what AfD is for). I went to do just that but it appears it's already been redirected. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:53, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.