3 Hard Inches (smallsploitation Movie Idea)

"Your OBBESSED. "??

You sure it's me? Why are you so obSessed with defending the irrational?

One post back you suggested I look at a dictionary. You suggested I ignore Wally rather than "bust in" to his threads. That it's "on me" because I don't accept an essentially retracted apology. And now that I've directly addressed ALL of your issues with me, I'm worked up and obsessed.

So we should all just listen to you, and not reply to you, and ignore Wally. Why are replies such a problem?
Just be honest Kim you want WALLY banned and as of now hes going nowhere.
 
Just be honest Kim you want WALLY banned and as of now hes going nowhere.

Be honest? Was I unclear when I responded directly to you yesterday and wrote that I think he should be banned?

He's going nowhere, and neither am I. You're the one who seems to have trouble accepting this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 693987 and MisterB
Be honest? Was I unclear when I responded directly to you yesterday and wrote that I think he should be banned?

He's going nowhere, and neither am I. You're the one who seems to have trouble accepting this.
OK
 
I have been thinking about the philosophical implications of Smallsploitation and have come to some interesting conclusions.

If you think about it the current size dynamics represent a planned universe with a clear hierarchical structure. But by turning that structure on its head or outright ignoring it, Smallsploitation is inherently nihilistic. But it is a positive nihilism that allows Smalls to create their own meaning in life instead of the meaning and purpose assigned by their dick size.

What do you guys think?
I think you attempt to use three-dollar words without understanding their meaning. You're writing gibberish.

And as usual, you are working under assumptions that are not universal themes or understandings.
 
Ohhhh.

Segregation means separation. There is no alternate definition. What you described was forced separation. That's the definition of segregation.





Your apology was hollow and meant nothing, as you've backtracked on it several times since, accusing members of being oversensitive. Because apparently cancer isn't something to be sensitive about.

This post is so typical of you: making up your own definitions, and excusing and/or rationalizing your hatred.

Malcolm explains the difference between separation and segregation.

No apology will ever be enough for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: welovebigcock
Movement?
A movement is, "a group of people working together to advance their shared political, social, or artistic ideas."

There is no "movement."

There is no such thing as "smallsploitation". No movies, no videos, no people clamoring for your brand of fiction.

Your attempt to fabricate legitimacy for this is pathetically obvious.

Every movement is started by someone. I'm starting this one. You can join in or get out of our way!
 
  • Like
Reactions: welovebigcock

A sincere apology is always enough. One that's quickly followed by rationalization and insults to those to whom you apologized is not sincere. THAT will not be enough. You showed nothing that indicated actual regret for what you wrote.

And let's be clear: you wish your apology meant nobody would ever mention that horrible thread again. If you actually had a change of heart regarding all of this crap you write, that would likely happen. But you keep pounding the same tired drum, so your past threads, which are no different than today's, keep coming back to haunt you.

Malcolm understood that desired separation was not the same as segregation, which *can be * but isn't necessarily forced. Unfortunately for your argument, you forget that you proposed all of this as forced action. "Smalls should be made to...." was among your comments to that effect.
 
A sincere apology is always enough. One that's quickly followed by rationalization and insults to those to whom you apologized is not sincere. THAT will not be enough. You showed nothing that indicated actual regret for what you wrote.

And let's be clear: you wish your apology meant nobody would ever mention that horrible thread again. If you actually had a change of heart regarding all of this crap you write, that would likely happen. But you keep pounding the same tired drum, so your past threads, which are no different than today's, keep coming back to haunt you.

Malcolm understood that desired separation was not the same as segregation, which *can be * but isn't necessarily forced. Unfortunately for your argument, you forget that you proposed all of this as forced action. "Smalls should be made to...." was among your comments to that effect.

I don't know why you jeep o bringing up these old arguments, but I'm pretty sure I said that Smalls would have a choice.
 
I don't know why you jeep o bringing up these old arguments, but I'm pretty sure I said that Smalls would have a choice.
You posted them, and haven't changed anything but a few details when you met resistance. They are as relevant now to your opinions as they were then. They demonstrate that your attitude is pervasive. The fact that you know your opinions will upset some people and persist in posting them is textbook trolling. Do you deny trolling, and stating that you know your posts are trolling?
 
Wherever you typed them, of course.

I am rolling my eyes so hard right now.


You posted them, and haven't changed anything but a few details when you met resistance. They are as relevant now to your opinions as they were then. They demonstrate that your attitude is pervasive. The fact that you know your opinions will upset some people and persist in posting them is textbook trolling. Do you deny trolling, and stating that you know your posts are trolling?

Where in this thread have I written about separation that wasn't in reply to you? I haven't. You keep on bringing it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: welovebigcock
I don't know why you jeep o bringing up these old arguments, but I'm pretty sure I said that Smalls would have a choice.

A quick peek says you never had choice in the equation.

I essentially agree with you. I have already accepted the fact that my purpose in life is to show the value of big dicks through my lack of value. The problem is that not all "men" with small dicks accept that fate. They want to live life as a Big. They want sex, respect, physical affection from women, monogamy and the right to live above ground. They're thumbing their noses up at the natural order of things and I think for that reason us Smalls will be smacked down by our big dicked superiors.
 
I am rolling my eyes so hard right now.




Where in this thread have I written about separation that wasn't in reply to you? I haven't. You keep on bringing it up.
Now you're just being obtuse, or can't manage to follow a line of dialog. I don't "keep bringing it up"...I mentioned segregation while explaining the problems many of us have with your threads. YOU claimed that somehow your proposals were voluntary, and have continued to argue it.
 
What about some of the other ideas I've posted like the Superman story?

I try , no to read , tooo many of your postings as they are like black holes. But instead of drawing in matter and light , they draw in tension and conflict. I will admit to observing a few from a safe distance
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beedie Tijii
A totally silly movie; but i will admit to having watched it 3 times .
It should be an LPSG favorite, as Tricky Dick is one of the stars
Oh yeah, I mean it's like, not only silly but just deliberately fucking bad in various ways. But it's comedy gold too. The Nixon character is too much LOL. I will probably make it onto a third viewing as well at some point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ronin001
A few other people have already contributed to this thread. I think that is enough to qualify. We're starting a movement. You can't stop it. So step off hater.

I am a Small. I am trying to uplift my people. We get shit on so much by society that we need positive representation. Small dicks jokes are so common that they have an entry on the topic at TV Tropes.

tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Ma

You guys are unrelenting tour hatred. I could save a basket of puppies and you all would find some way to call me a bigot. Sad.

Don’t play the victim here. You are the one who wanted to start a war to get rid of your so-called smalls, have people rather die of cancer than having a small penis, deny them jobs, relationships, etc. And now suddenly you want to start a movement? Suddenly your so-called Smalls need to be rescued and saved? It’s absurd. You’ve done nothing but insulting people with a small penis, basically calling for them to be eradicated and now you are their champion?

Furthermore you failed to answer any of my questions on your proposed movies. Who is going to star and who is coming to see it? You are not starting a movement. Movements happen and then find a spokesperson. We call these people leaders. Sometimes someone tries the other way around and proclaims his fallacies to be th start of a movements. We call these people lunatics.